![]() What i would suggest would be: Use USB 3.1 Gen2 Type C or a eSATA / SATA / SASīut allways: Use a second fast enough disk.Īnd allways: Cloning to another disk and the copy back the file is much faster that using only one of the disk unless it is a SSD or a hard disk with independent multi-head arms (they can read and write at the same time on two surface places, each head has its own arm, very expensive, about >9876€). You tell about LAN be slower, but not about USB (2.0, not to mention 1.1 or 1.0) is much times slower. Mechanical disks, when read & write on same disk at same time (or much fragmented), go down for near 20 megabytes per second, while on non fragmented only read or only write can go to more than 100 megabytes per second. Some have 1Gib/s LAN, so it can transfer more than more than 100 megabytes per second, so it will not be a bottleneck (unless you have a really fast SSD). ![]() Some have 10Gib/s LAN, so it can transfer more than one gigabyte per second, so it will not be a bottleneck.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |